NCRI reveales accurate information about Iranian neuclear sites

The UN atomic watchdog confirmed its chief   headed last Wednesday to Tehran for talks on a stalled nuclear bomb probe, a key sticking point in talks between Iran and major powers.
The aim of International Atomic Energy Agency head Yukiya Amano’s talks on Thursday is to 'accelerate the resolution of all outstanding issues related to Iran’s nuclear program, including clarification of possible military dimensions', the IAEA said.
The IAEA keeps close tabs on Iran’s declared nuclear activities, making sure that all nuclear material is accounted for and that its facilities are being used for exclusively peaceful purposes.

At the same time , in an interview with INTV  , Alireza Jafarzadeh, President of the Washington-based Strategic Policy Consulting Inc. and spokesperson for the National Council of Resistance of Iran ( NCRI ), said: “Iranian regime did not answer to any of the IAEA’s questions regarding evidence nuclear bomb making activities.”

Q: What important aspects does the latest IAEA report handed over to the UN Security Council, specify?

Jafarzadeh: This report points out four important issues, which are all in criticizing tone. They also reveal the Iranian regime’s defiance to international obligations.
1- First of all the regime has increased its enriched uranium in the Natanz site, first revealed by the National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI) in 2002. It is holding 2.5 tons of enriched uranium, which if is enriched in high grade, is enough for two nuclear bombs.
2- By use of a chain centrifuge cascade in the training site of Natanz, they have enriched a noticeable amount of uranium up to 20%, which brings it closer to building a nuclear bomb.
3- A number of equipment and chemical substances that Tehran claimed were only used for a series of scientific experiments have been relocated and kept away from the eyes of IAEA agents. Tehran is not answering any questions in this regard, where these equipments are and what are they conducting? The sensitivity of this issue lies in the fact that these equipments are used for uranium rod precision to convert them into nuclear bomb material.
4- None of the IAEA’s questions regarding evidence that could have shown Tehran is involved in bomb-making activities have been answered. Also, numerous questions remain unanswered regarding sites in Natanz, Qom, and others, all described in full detail in IAEA’s recent report.

Q: Mr. Jafarzadeh, describe the importance of this report in the current situation and its effects on the Iranian regime in the international scene?

Jafarzadeh: All the facts stated in the IAEA report are against the Iranian regime’s obligations regarding the UNSC resolutions. In short, this report is one of the strongest IAEA reports so far regarding the Iranian regime’s nuclear program.
Well, this report is issued at a time that a strong draft resolution on the Iranian regime’s nuclear program is on the table in the UNSC and on the other hand, Tehran is trying to use other countries as mediators and also come up with new deceitful deals to swap low-enriched uranium for high-enriched uranium. All these efforts are intended to deprive the international community in taking a strong, unified stance against the Iranian regime.
Therefore, in this period of time, this resolution is acting as a sledgehammer on the mullahs, seriously isolating it internationally and degrades Tehran’s stance against the UNSC.
On the other hand, this proves the Iranian resistance stance that from the very beginning foresaw step by step the goals and ambitions of the mullahs and revealed them with accurate information

               

Iranian military sites must be inspected in any final nuclear deal

By Iran reporter

April 1th 12015

The National Council of Resistance of Iran, NCRI has

recently reviled that despite the clerical regime's claim of wanting to seal a deal with the world powers, they are secretly cooperating with the North Koreans who are clearly defying the international demands for giving up their nuclear weapons' program.

The NCRI declared that the Iranian regime and the North Koreans have been engaged in extensive exchange of information and visits by their respective experts on nuclear weapons and nuclear warhead design as recently as April 2015. The NCRI has provided detailed account of these visits including a visit to North Korea in 2013 of Tehran’s top nuclear weapons experts headed by elusive Mohsen Fakhrizadeh, who was present during the last nuclear test conducted by the North Korean government.

During these visits, the two sides discuss and exchange plans and provide assistances and consultations in the areas of aerodynamics, missile body design, and electronic components of warheads.

On the other front, the mullahs' regime is extensively involved in the nuclear talks with the west speeding toward the June 30th deadline after nearly two years of back and forth visits and negotiations. The last meeting between the US delegation led by Secretary John Kerry and Iranian regime's foreign minister, Zarif ended on Saturday, May 30, 2015 in Geneva without reaching a tangible result and as the news agencies described "with no breakthrough."

Tehran has rejected a key Western demand for the inspections of specific sites i.e. suspected military sites. Access to such sites has been considered pivotal to any transparent deal, if there could ever be one.

According to the Iranian Resistance and the NCRI who have unveiled numerous illicit activities by the clerical regime ruling Iran, Tehran has been conducting tests on nuclear trigger mechanism at its military sites.

Yukiya Amano, the head of the UN atomic watchdog agency, IAEA said this week that if Iran signs a nuclear deal with the world powers it will have to accept inspections of its military sites.

Mr. Amano added that Iran had agreed to implement the Additional Protocol of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty that allows for snap inspections.

"When we find inconsistency or when we have doubts, we can request access to the undeclared location for example, and this could include military sites," he said.

Despite all that, Iran is denying the IAEA access to its sensitive sites and rejects any interviews with its nuclear scientists. This has made the whole deal up in the air and uncertain.

If Iran is rejecting the inspection of its suspected nuclear sites including its military sites, and if it is forbidden to interview Iran's nuclear scientists, then how can the world be sure that the mullahs are not going to fool them again and come up with an Atom bomb in just a few short months after a deal is reached, and who with the right mind would invest even a penny on the mullahs' deceptive words that a so called "Islamic decree" by the blood thirsty Supreme Leader is going to keep the godfather of terrorism and ISIS from acquiring a nuclear bomb?

The Iranian regime needs to export its internal social crisis outside of the country by dominating the Middle East region, but unfortunately Obama's administration try to negotiate with them,   giving the mullahs in Iran the concession that the US has been giving so far is not only detrimental to the security of the region, but to the security of the entire world.

 And over all, the Iranian military sites must be inspected in any final nuclear deal, and the main opposition group, Mujahedin-e-khalg with NCRI as its   parliament in exile should be supported by the world community to get rid of such harmful phenomena

Tehran continues meddling in Arab countries And Obama ignores

Iran reporter

May 30, 2015

 

As the Islamic Republic of 

Ayatollahs nears a landmark nuclear agreement with the U.S. and other world powers, the Middle East’s future depends on which force emerges as the main player in the region.

Some of Iran’s neighbors are concerned if the financial windfall from the lifting of sanctions enable the pro-terrorism hard-liners in Iran step up the export of Iran’s Islamic extremism throughout the region.

Hasan Rouhani and his Foreign Minister Javad Zarif have invested much political capital to bring their regime to the cusp of a nuclear deal.

 “The nuclear issue would be the first step for testing whether the engagement policy is successful. If the U.S. continues the policy of engagement rather than confrontation, you would find Iran much more flexible and much more ready to cooperate on regional issues,” said the head of the foreign relations committee at Iran’s National Security Council until 2005.

Iran’s involvement in regional conflicts led by the Revolutionary Guards and other hard-line elements of the regime, From Syria and Iraq to Yemen has been expanded.

Many of Iran’s Arab neighbors, along with their European allies such as France, are concerned these elements will be further energized by a completed nuclear deal, which is expected to unfreeze Iran’s access to as much as $150 billion in overseas assets.

Hoping the nuclear agreement will curtail Iran’s forays abroad is as naive as arguing in 2013 that the deal to remove chemical weapons from Syria would ease the brutality of Bashar al-Assad’s regime, said Jean-Pierre Filiu, a professor of Middle East studies at Sciences Po university in Paris and a former diplomatic adviser to the French prime minister.

“What I see is, since the preliminary deal [in April], things have become worse in Syria, worse in Yemen, and worse in Iraq,” he said.

President Barack Obama, who also has staked much political capital on the nuclear talks, told the Saudi-owned Asharq al-Awsat newspaper earlier this month that he couldn’t predict Iran’s internal dynamics.

Mr. Obama added, however, that “it is possible that if we can successfully address the nuclear question and Iran begins to receive relief from some nuclear sanctions, it could lead to more investments in the Iranian economy and more opportunity for the Iranian people, which could strengthen the hands of more moderate leaders in Iran.”?

Maybe the US actual president supposes that he can insult Iranian people's intelligence by using such phrases.

 While many Iranians desire profound change at home, a remarkable segment of those with that ambition remain suppressed since the crackdown on the 2009 “public revolt” put many dissidents in jail or forced them into exile.

Today, many influential Iranian voices such as the MEK, Mojahedin Khalg who have been suppressed by the clerical regime of Tehran for more than four decades, still work to overthrow the Ayatollahs.  The majority of the Iranian people want the regime to be to replaced and they should be replaced by democratic regime as Maryam Rajavi has declared in her ten points announcement in the grand gathering of the Iranian dissidents in Paris.

The Iranian opposition group who is led by Maryam Rajavi and with its political branch in Paris in the name of National council of resistance is the best solution who can overthrow the Ayatollah's regime in Iran. The decisive storm led by Saudi Arabia is the unique solution to kike out Iran's Arab terrorist militias in the Gulf countries. Finally, time to cut off the head of serpent in Teheran.