Tehran continues meddling in Arab countries And Obama ignores

Iran reporter

May 30, 2015

 

As the Islamic Republic of 

Ayatollahs nears a landmark nuclear agreement with the U.S. and other world powers, the Middle East’s future depends on which force emerges as the main player in the region.

Some of Iran’s neighbors are concerned if the financial windfall from the lifting of sanctions enable the pro-terrorism hard-liners in Iran step up the export of Iran’s Islamic extremism throughout the region.

Hasan Rouhani and his Foreign Minister Javad Zarif have invested much political capital to bring their regime to the cusp of a nuclear deal.

 “The nuclear issue would be the first step for testing whether the engagement policy is successful. If the U.S. continues the policy of engagement rather than confrontation, you would find Iran much more flexible and much more ready to cooperate on regional issues,” said the head of the foreign relations committee at Iran’s National Security Council until 2005.

Iran’s involvement in regional conflicts led by the Revolutionary Guards and other hard-line elements of the regime, From Syria and Iraq to Yemen has been expanded.

Many of Iran’s Arab neighbors, along with their European allies such as France, are concerned these elements will be further energized by a completed nuclear deal, which is expected to unfreeze Iran’s access to as much as $150 billion in overseas assets.

Hoping the nuclear agreement will curtail Iran’s forays abroad is as naive as arguing in 2013 that the deal to remove chemical weapons from Syria would ease the brutality of Bashar al-Assad’s regime, said Jean-Pierre Filiu, a professor of Middle East studies at Sciences Po university in Paris and a former diplomatic adviser to the French prime minister.

“What I see is, since the preliminary deal [in April], things have become worse in Syria, worse in Yemen, and worse in Iraq,” he said.

President Barack Obama, who also has staked much political capital on the nuclear talks, told the Saudi-owned Asharq al-Awsat newspaper earlier this month that he couldn’t predict Iran’s internal dynamics.

Mr. Obama added, however, that “it is possible that if we can successfully address the nuclear question and Iran begins to receive relief from some nuclear sanctions, it could lead to more investments in the Iranian economy and more opportunity for the Iranian people, which could strengthen the hands of more moderate leaders in Iran.”?

Maybe the US actual president supposes that he can insult Iranian people's intelligence by using such phrases.

 While many Iranians desire profound change at home, a remarkable segment of those with that ambition remain suppressed since the crackdown on the 2009 “public revolt” put many dissidents in jail or forced them into exile.

Today, many influential Iranian voices such as the MEK, Mojahedin Khalg who have been suppressed by the clerical regime of Tehran for more than four decades, still work to overthrow the Ayatollahs.  The majority of the Iranian people want the regime to be to replaced and they should be replaced by democratic regime as Maryam Rajavi has declared in her ten points announcement in the grand gathering of the Iranian dissidents in Paris.

The Iranian opposition group who is led by Maryam Rajavi and with its political branch in Paris in the name of National council of resistance is the best solution who can overthrow the Ayatollah's regime in Iran. The decisive storm led by Saudi Arabia is the unique solution to kike out Iran's Arab terrorist militias in the Gulf countries. Finally, time to cut off the head of serpent in Teheran.