Less than a week after air strikes on a hospital in the Syrian battleground city of Aleppo killed at least 30 people, the council unanimously adopted the measure that strongly condemned the targeting of health facilities and recalled that such attacks are war crimes.
French Ambassador Francois Delattre said it was a "major resolution" that sent a strong warning that there can be "no impunity" for the perpetrators of attacks on medical facilities.
The resolution does not break any new legal ground but British Ambassador Matthew Rycroft stressed that it was "shining a spotlight" on the increase in attacks and serves as a reminder that hospitals, ambulances and medical workers cannot be targets in war.
It was the first-ever resolution adopted by the council specifically on the need to protect medical facilities in war zones.
According to Doctors Without Borders (MSF), there were 94 attacks in Syria against hospitals and clinics supported by that NGO and three MSF-linked health facilities in Yemen have been bombed over the past six months.
"Hospitals and patients have been dragged onto the battlefield," MSF president Joanne Liu told the council. "Stop these attacks", she pleaded. "Make this resolution save lives."
'SOMETHING IS DEEPLY WRONG'
The resolution does not name countries, but "demands that all parties to armed conflicts" ensure "the respect and protection" of medical personnel as well as their ambulances, hospitals and other health facilities.
"Such attacks must end," UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon told the council. "When so-called surgical strikes end up hitting surgical wards, something is deeply wrong."
The resolution was drafted by five non-permanent Security Council members: Egypt, Japan, Spain, New Zealand and Uruguay.
It was presented at a time when four of the five permanent council members - Britain, France, Russia and the United States - are backing parties in the Syria conflict.
French Ambassador Francois Delattre said it was a "major resolution" that sent a strong warning that there can be "no impunity" for the perpetrators of attacks on medical facilities.
The resolution does not break any new legal ground but British Ambassador Matthew Rycroft stressed that it was "shining a spotlight" on the increase in attacks and serves as a reminder that hospitals, ambulances and medical workers cannot be targets in war.
It was the first-ever resolution adopted by the council specifically on the need to protect medical facilities in war zones.
According to Doctors Without Borders (MSF), there were 94 attacks in Syria against hospitals and clinics supported by that NGO and three MSF-linked health facilities in Yemen have been bombed over the past six months.
"Hospitals and patients have been dragged onto the battlefield," MSF president Joanne Liu told the council. "Stop these attacks", she pleaded. "Make this resolution save lives."
'SOMETHING IS DEEPLY WRONG'
The resolution does not name countries, but "demands that all parties to armed conflicts" ensure "the respect and protection" of medical personnel as well as their ambulances, hospitals and other health facilities.
"Such attacks must end," UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon told the council. "When so-called surgical strikes end up hitting surgical wards, something is deeply wrong."
The resolution was drafted by five non-permanent Security Council members: Egypt, Japan, Spain, New Zealand and Uruguay.
It was presented at a time when four of the five permanent council members - Britain, France, Russia and the United States - are backing parties in the Syria conflict.
No comments:
Post a Comment