|
For nearly four decades Iran's regime has literally posed the first and foremost threat for peace and security in the world
|
Shahriar Kia a press spokesman for residents of Camp Liberty in
Baghdad, Iraq has written an article on the 'growing threat of Islamic
fundamentalism' led by Iran's regime and how the US administration
appeasement policy toward Tehran has raised this threat in the Middle
East and throughout the world.
The following is the full article posted on the News Max:
As
the world continues to struggle in its effort to find a solution to the
ever growing threat of Islamic fundamentalism, a very simple reality is
very often overlooked -- and at times deliberately neglected.
In
the years leading to World War II, the appeasement policy advocated by
the British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain vis-a-vis the fascist
regimes of Europe forced him to declare war on Nazi Germany after
Hitler’s 1939 invasion of Poland, and the rest is history.
Decades
later, we are literally witnessing history repeating itself as the
West, spearheaded by the Obama administration in Washington, has once
again embraced the appeasement/engagement policy. This time, it is with a
fascist regime in Iran. The objective is to encourage the emergence of
moderates from within the mullahs’ establishment. This misguided policy
has unfortunately led to the de facto rise of Islamic fundamentalism.
The
regime in Iran is relying on three main pillars and platforms to
safeguard its ruling system: domestic oppression and harrowing human
rights violations, perennial support for international terrorism, and
the all-out effort to obtain nuclear weapons by any means possible.
Long
before Daesh -- the Arabic acronym for the self-proclaimed Islamic
State, also known as ISIS or ISIL -- ever came to existence, the mullahs
sitting on the throne in Iran claimed having the prophecy and
manifestation to rule over all Islamic countries under such a caliphate.
For nearly four decades, Iran has literally posed the first and
foremost threat for peace and security for Middle East and beyond.
The
Obama administration sought to tame the regime in Iran through an
outreach effort to seal an agreement over Tehran's ongoing differences
with the international community regarding its suspicious and
clandestine nuclear program.
After years of overt and covert
talks, the P5+1 finally closed an agreement in July 2015 for Iran to
cooperate in curbing its emblematic nuclear program in return for
certain concessions.
The international community expected Iran to at least principally alter previous methods, and remedy its menacing behavior.
However,
the mullahs in Tehran – under pressure from their dismal base – built
on this naïve expectation and continued wreaking havoc by meddling in
the region, test-firing a string of ballistic missiles despite the U.N.
Security Council denouncing such measures, and launching massive waves
of executions in prisons across the country.
The International
Institute of Strategic Studies reported on April 20th: “US Cent-com
commander General Lloyd Austin testified in March that Iran’s regional
behavior has not changed since the nuclear deal, for better or for
worse: ‘The fact remains that Iran today is a significant destabilizing
force in the region.’”
Newsweek raised the question of Iran ever
maturing into an appropriate neighbor, describing how Tehran has
resorted to pursuing “deterrence and military power projection through
means of its ballistic missiles, an alliance with Lebanese Hezbollah and
the rest of its regional proxy army, and its suite of asymmetric naval
capabilities designed to threaten Persian Gulf shipping and U.S.
maritime dominance.”
Interestingly, despite all these undeniable
facts, the West, and the Obama administration in particular, simply
refuse to accept the reality that Iran will not budge to denounce its
past or welcome any change whatsoever, nor will it allow its already
tenuous hegemony be tethered.
American Thinker’s Rick Moran best
summarized and articulated this harsh reality with reference to Iran’s
approach regarding its nuclear pact with the P5+1: “I'm trying to decide
what's more jaw-dropping: Obama thinking Iran is interested in adhering
to the 'spirit' of the treaty, or that the president actually believed
the Iranians ever intended to adhere to it.”
We have to accept the fact that any talk of “moderates” and “hardliners” in Iran is merely playing into Tehran’s hands.
The
mentality of all factions inside Iran is founded based on Islamic
fundamentalism, denying freedoms for all and most importantly, strict
gender segregation and discrimination.
Iran under its “moderate” President
Hassan Rouhani
is known to have executed more than 2,400 people from June 2013 onward.
Recent startling reports indicate Iran sent 23 prisoners to the gallows
in the span of two days of May 17th and 18th, and placed in solitary
confinement 10 young inmates aged between 21 and 25, all in preparation
for their executions.
Further disturbing news from Iran show how
dozens of high school graduates were arrested and lashed 99 times each
for throwing, and dancing at, a graduation party. This should provide a
clear insight about the mullahs’ temperament.
This complex,
defiant threat was first unearthed more than two decades ago by the
Iranian opposition in a book titled Islamic Fundamentalism: The New
Global Threat. It precisely evaluated the very foundation of this
mentality.
Had these warnings been taken seriously, and received
the attention they deserved, rest assured that neither al-Qaida nor
Daesh would have emerged. Iraq would not have been taken hostage by
Iran-backed Shiite militias sowing the seeds of “sedition and division.”
Nor would Bashar al-Assad, following the footsteps dictated by
Iran, have massacred the Syrian people in a turmoil enduring for more
than five years now.
The regime in Tehran is the epicenter of provoking this multi-layered misery, and offers a safe haven for terrorists.
Four
decades of their onslaught against the Middle East and world over has
proven the international community has been neglecting the mainstream
solution to this major dilemma.
The National Council of Resistance of Iran, symbolized in the leadership of
Maryam Rajavi and her 10-point plan for Iran, presents a democratic alternative for Iran to dislodge the mullahs.
As former New York City Mayor Rudolph W. Giuliani stated at a major
NCRI -sponsored
gathering back in June 2015: “This is a critical time for freedom in
Iran. Now more than ever, it is essential for President Obama and
Secretary Kerry to keep the pressure on the Iranian Government.”
He
added: “At the core of all these problems is the regime in Iran. It
should be changed, it must be changed, it has to be changed…There should
be support by the United States government for an opposition in Iran.
The United States government should support the opposition groups, Mrs.
Rajavi's being the most prominent, and the biggest.'
Shahriar Kia
is a press spokesman for residents of Camp Liberty, Iraq, and members
of the People’s Mujahedin Organization of Iran opposition group (PMOI,
also known as MEK). Twitter: @shahriarkia