Obama’s negative performance

By: Iran Reporter

June, 3, 2015

Iran Nuclear Agreement Review Act is now on its way to the White House for a reluctant signature by President Obama. He was forced to accept, by overwhelming votes in both chambers, Congress’s constitutional role in reviewing any nuclear deal with Iran and the lifting of any compressional imposed sanctions. Now the hardest work begins.
The president must either negotiate an agreement that will permanently prevent an untrustworthy Iranian regime from acquiring nuclear weapons—or continue his wrong direction that will lead to a nuclear Iran. No doubt that Congress will stop him! Now, more Americans are viewing President Obama’s performances negatively, according to a new survey.

The CNN/ORC poll finds that 45 percent approve of Obama’s tenure, while 52 percent disapprove.Those numbers reveal rising discontent with Obama’s White House since April, CNN said. Back then, 48 percent approved of the president while 47 percent did not.The latest sampling also shows growing worries that the U.S. is heading in the wrong direction.A key factor in Obama’s falling job rating may stem from his handling of the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS).

Iranian Ayatollahs sit at the nexus of nearly every major global threat: the Syrian crisis, the rise of ISIS, the resurgence of AL Qaeda, the crisis in Iraq that threatens gains won with U.S. blood, the chaos in Yemen that is adding to the threat of an all-out regional war,Now Iranian Ayatollahs try to hijack the commercial cargoes in Arab sea a few miles near the American Navy.!!!To allow this monster to acquire nuclear weapons and the ability to deploy them against Arab countries - and preaching their radical Islamic organizations—would constitute an incalculable threat to global security. It would set off a nuclear-arms race that would virtually guarantee a regional war with global implications.

Obama tries to lift the international sanctions from Ayatollahs before proof that they are in compliance.Can the world have a good faith agreement with a regime that for decades has lied and cheated? Can the international community ever trust a regime that has lied for decades and still has not come clean about its nuclear program?

Will Iranian Ayatollahs be required to demonstrate changed behavior—with respect to their nuclear ambitions and their sponsorship of terrorism?

Up to now Mr. Obama has helped Iran to approach the Bomb!! The question is, this man neither does not know the rule of such a dangerous game nor has his own benefits to sacrifice Iranian people on the one hand and to play with the American dignity on the other!! Secret nuclear sites in Iran would not help Mr., Obama!! At all, His best choice is to side the Iranian people who seek for freedom and democracy for decades but Obama and his allies have deprived them to have democracy in their country.

President Obama’s performances need to be reevaluated. He needs to side the Iranian opposition group instead of siding the Ayatollahs, to be accepted by his own people.