Iran’s cyber army – new intelligence confirms ongoing Global threat

briefing at the National Press Club in Washington

The deputy director of the Washington office of the National Council of Resistance of Iran ( NCRI ), Alireza Jafarzadeh in an article published in ‘The Hill’ explained about the Iranian regime’s involvement in a series of cyber-attacks against the United States.
Mr. Jafarzadeh said that the U.S. Justice Department reported that Iran, by 2013, was behind a series of cyber-attacks that targeted a minimum of 46 companies and a dam. However, the latest intelligence about the scope and depth of the mullahs’ regime’s involvement in a cyber-war against the U.S. is “widening the anti-terror focus”.
Hackers linked to the IRGC (Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps), between 2011 and 2013, are said to have attacked financial institutions such as the New York Stock Exchange and Bank of America, as well as other companies such as AT&T.
Another target was a flood-control dam 25 miles north of New York City.  Jafarzadeh explains that the hackers “broke into the command and control system of the dam in 2013” and would have been able to release water from behind the dam if it had not been for the fact that, at the time of intrusion, the sluice gate had been manually disconnected.
Jafarzadeh explains that this is an “unequivocal warning that the Iranian regime is preparing to mount a larger cyber-attack against American infrastructure”.
Recent reports from inside the Iranian regime indicate that the IRGC commander Mohammad-Ali Jafari is working to create a “Cyber Force” which will act as the “sixth force” of the IRGC (beside the ground forces, navy, aerospace, extraterritorial Qods (Jerusalem) Force and domestic Bassij militia).
IRGC Brigadier General Hossein Hamedani (killed during battle in Syria) said in 2010 that Bassij cyber council had trained over 1,500 people to become cyber jihadis. He also promised that their activities would increase.
President Obama once said that Iran has a desire to get “right with the world”. But the regime is still committed to pursuing a strategic war against the U.S. and its allies and Jafarzadeh warns that any “hopes of change in behaviour are illusory at best”.

Obama preserved Iran’s nuclear program

Obama’s message to progressive activists  in the united states is warning his supporters He said  'You will hear a lot of arguments out there about why this is a ’bad deal’ from people who, frankly, would be opposed to any deal with Iran.'
ُThe real policy makers in the world believe that Obama deal   just preserves Iran’s  nuclear program. Until last month, the west’s position was that Iran couldn’t be allowed to become a nuclear threshold state. Our position now is that it can be allowed provided that Iran does Barack Obama a favor by waiting 10 years to install the advanced equipment that’ll shrink its “breakout” time down to nothing. We’ve endorsed Iran’s right to do that, leaving a future president boxed in when he/she is inevitably forced to confront Iran again about its nuclear ambitions. Obama strengthened Iran’s hand against his successor’s because it was politically convenient for him, personally, to do so. He solved the Iran problem for himself, not for America.
Actually, maybe he didn’t solve it for himself either.
The U.S. intelligence community has informed Congress of evidence that Iran was sanitizing its suspected nuclear military site at Parchin, in broad daylight, days after agreeing to a nuclear deal with world powers.
For senior lawmakers in both parties, the evidence calls into question Iran’s intention to fully account for the possible military dimensions of its current and past nuclear development. The International Atomic Energy Agency and Iran have a side agreement meant to resolve past suspicions about the Parchin site, and lawmakers’ concerns about it has already become a flashpoint because they do not have access to its text.
My, my. Covering up the evidence of bomb work already? Luckily the UN will have a chance to grill Iran’s nuclear scientists about that. Or will they?
Iran so far has refused to allow United Nations inspectors to interview key scientists and military officers to investigate allegations that Tehran maintained a covert nuclear-weapons program, the head of the U.N.’s nuclear watchdog said in an interview Wednesday…
The IAEA and its director-general, Yukiya Amano, have been trying for more than five years to debrief Mohsen Fakhrizadeh-Mahabadi, an Iranian military officer the U.S., Israel and IAEA suspect oversaw weaponization work in Tehran until at least 2003…
But during an interview in Washington, Mr. Amano said Iran still hasn’t agreed to provide access to Mr. Fakhrizadeh or other top Iranian military officers and nuclear scientists to assist the IAEA in completing its probe.more

Bad Iran Deal Breeds Warranted Skepticism

By Michaela Dodge

On Wednesday, President Obama will make a personalpush to sell the flawed Iran deal to the American public and Congress.
The president’s efforts to sell his bad deal are unsurprising, considering that the more Americans have learned about the deal, the less they like it.
They have plenty of reasons for skepticism.
The deal with Iran is deeply flawed and rewards years of Iranian cheating and lying about the nature of its nuclear program.
Iran has never reasonably explained its nuclear activities.
This is because the only plausible answer is that Iran interested in pursuing a nuclear weapon program, including experiments with explosives.
This is definitely more than an academic interest in shaping highly enriched uranium to a spherical shape (one needs two such spheres for a nuclear device).
The deal leaves the Iranian nuclear infrastructure largely intact—and dismantles sanctions that successive administrations and Congress have put into place, including on Iranians directly responsible for American deaths.
Even the Obama administration recognized that these sanctions likely slowed down Iran’s nuclear progress.
The American people are also skeptical of the administration’s efforts to circumvent Congress.
Last week U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry admitted as much when he said that the agreement wasn’t treated as a treaty “because you can’t pass a treaty anymore.”
Political expediency was clearly not the primary concern of our founding fathers when the Constitution was drafted. If the Iran deal can’t pass as a treaty, then John Kerry has no one but himself to blame.
Had the administration done a better job in negotiating the agreement and not give in to Iran’s dangerous demands, the deal would have sailed through Congress and Americans would have supported it.
To add insult to injury, the president chose to send the deal to the United Nations before he sent it to Congress.
Americans like to be guided by the old adage: “Trust, but verify.”
Obama does not lack trust when it comes to dealing with Iran, the world’s largest sponsor of terrorism—but he is short on verification.
Americans are not permitted to be a part of inspections teams that will go to Iran to monitor its nuclear progress. more

Obama’s negative performance

By: Iran Reporter

June, 3, 2015

Iran Nuclear Agreement Review Act is now on its way to the White House for a reluctant signature by President Obama. He was forced to accept, by overwhelming votes in both chambers, Congress’s constitutional role in reviewing any nuclear deal with Iran and the lifting of any compressional imposed sanctions. Now the hardest work begins.
The president must either negotiate an agreement that will permanently prevent an untrustworthy Iranian regime from acquiring nuclear weapons—or continue his wrong direction that will lead to a nuclear Iran. No doubt that Congress will stop him! Now, more Americans are viewing President Obama’s performances negatively, according to a new survey.

The CNN/ORC poll finds that 45 percent approve of Obama’s tenure, while 52 percent disapprove.Those numbers reveal rising discontent with Obama’s White House since April, CNN said. Back then, 48 percent approved of the president while 47 percent did not.The latest sampling also shows growing worries that the U.S. is heading in the wrong direction.A key factor in Obama’s falling job rating may stem from his handling of the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS).

Iranian Ayatollahs sit at the nexus of nearly every major global threat: the Syrian crisis, the rise of ISIS, the resurgence of AL Qaeda, the crisis in Iraq that threatens gains won with U.S. blood, the chaos in Yemen that is adding to the threat of an all-out regional war,Now Iranian Ayatollahs try to hijack the commercial cargoes in Arab sea a few miles near the American Navy.!!!To allow this monster to acquire nuclear weapons and the ability to deploy them against Arab countries - and preaching their radical Islamic organizations—would constitute an incalculable threat to global security. It would set off a nuclear-arms race that would virtually guarantee a regional war with global implications.

Obama tries to lift the international sanctions from Ayatollahs before proof that they are in compliance.Can the world have a good faith agreement with a regime that for decades has lied and cheated? Can the international community ever trust a regime that has lied for decades and still has not come clean about its nuclear program?

Will Iranian Ayatollahs be required to demonstrate changed behavior—with respect to their nuclear ambitions and their sponsorship of terrorism?

Up to now Mr. Obama has helped Iran to approach the Bomb!! The question is, this man neither does not know the rule of such a dangerous game nor has his own benefits to sacrifice Iranian people on the one hand and to play with the American dignity on the other!! Secret nuclear sites in Iran would not help Mr., Obama!! At all, His best choice is to side the Iranian people who seek for freedom and democracy for decades but Obama and his allies have deprived them to have democracy in their country.

President Obama’s performances need to be reevaluated. He needs to side the Iranian opposition group instead of siding the Ayatollahs, to be accepted by his own people.

Planting the seeds of hope

By   Iran reporter

June 1sth 2015

As Mullahs’ regime in utter 

weakness is driving the region towards unprecedented crisis.

As the oppression, torture, hanging, medieval dooms are implemented across the country, despite the claims of moderation by Rohani cabinet,

As the officials of this regime plunder all Iranian assets, and the situation of the people life has deteriorated,

A huge gathering of Iranians in resistance meeting in Paris gives a response and plants the seeds of hope in Iran and entire region. A response to all cries that seeks freedom and rescue,

• a great gathering in Paris, thousands of Iranians, while being supported by a number of prominent European and American dignitaries, reminded that a major development is on the way in Iran and a democratic change, as a solution to avoid an unprecedented regional and international crisis, is at hand.

the President of the Maryam Rajavi , President-elect of the Iranian Resistance will symbolize millions of oppressed Iranians who seek for liberty and democracy in Iran more than Four decades but the International community has ignored them unfortunately!.

In this assembling Iran rises with all his great stature to say: I resist against tyrannical fundamental regime of fascist mullahs.

So, it is a national and international obligation for all compatriots and all who respect human values  to participate in this action and announce his presence!